Now, being the escapist that I am, this is a quality that I can find in a wide variety of films. And, as I've been watching movies for quite some time, the range stretches, not just across genres, but also from current to vintage. That being said, it seems kind of appropriate to discuss the first movie that ever made me feel the way that I've described. I'll mention here also that it is a "vintage" film. (So, if you don't like old movies, this probably isn't going to interest you.)
The film is "The Adventures of Robin Hood", released in 1938 by Warner Brothers Pictures Inc., directed by Michael Curtiz and William Keighley, starring Errol Flynn, Olivia de Havilland, Basil Rathbone and Claude Raines. Now, it should be understood and remembered from square one, this film exists in a completely different frame of reference than movies today. I take the time to bring that up because, every time I get into discussions about movies, and some vintage movie becomes a part of the conversation, misgivings and dislikes come up that are a direct result of the vintage nature of the film. I seem to always get into such discussions with people that always fail to (or are unable to) take into consideration the ambient society at the time of the movie's creation or the target audience of the film. If you're going to even attempt to discuss this movie in something at least resembling a practical fashion, these things should be considered.
"The Adventures of Robin Hood" was actually designed with escape in mind. From the music to the sets to the costumes, it was all about getting the audience to forget about life for a little over an hour and a half. And me being the escapist that I am, this movie was right up my alley.
This particular version of the story begins with King Richard (the Lionheart) having been captured on his way back from the Crusades, and held for ransom by Leopold of Austria. This provides Richard's brother, Prince John, an opportunity to attempt to seize the throne. The story unfolds from there.
The story and the setting of this film are refreshingly uncomplicated, as are the characters. The good and the bad exist only on either side of the line. There are no gray characters. The principle villians are Prince John (Claude Raines) and Sir Guy of Gisbourne (Basil Rathbone). Prince John, in his quest to secure the throne, sets upon a campaign of oppression through taxation against the Saxons in England. With the announcement of Richard's captivity, Prince John increases the collection, claiming the raising of a ransom to save King Richard as a reason. When the Saxons, already taxed into poverty are unable to meet the demands of the collectors, they are abused, tortured and killed.
time comes, he's up-front and clear about his passions, sometimes, almost to the point of being brazen. He's a self-proclaimed hater of injustice who backs up his words with action, and seeks no reward accept the well-being of all around him. His greatest passion, however, exists in his loyalty to King Richard. Nothing stands of greater value to him than that. And, later on in the film, though the king's identity is unknown to him at the time, he expresses this fact to King Richard himself.
(Lady) Marian is confused, at first. Unlike Prince John and Sir Guy, Marian is a good person. She's just been too sheltered to realize what's really happening and is unable to see the wrong that's being done to the people. Her eyes are opened, however, when she's captured by Robin and his men in the company of a procession carrying the treasure taken from the people by force. Having confiscated the treasure, Robin shows her that his and his men's only intention for the treasure is the ransom of King Richard. He also shows her the victims of the injustices inflicted on the people by the Norman nobility. With the knowledge of the truth of what Robin is doing, and that he's doing it because it's right and not for personal gain, she not only understands why, but begins to admire him for it. She recognizes the level of his dedication to the welfare of the people in his willingness to sacrifice his own privileges as a noble to protect them from Prince John and the Norman nobles. It is from this point that Marian begins to fall in love with Robin.
Sir Guy of Gisbourne, as a character, is just a step above a hatchet-man. For a greater part, he wears his nobility much like Prince John, but he's just not as "genteel". Though it is said at one point that he's in love with Marian, you wouldn't be able to tell that watching him. What attention he does show her seems to amount to little more than just trying to impress a pretty face. When he discovers Marian's efforts to help Robin, there's no visible sign of disappointment, and no compunctions about exposing her. With the exception of his loyalty to Prince John, anything else that you might be able to glean from his character is eclipsed by his hatred for Robin. And the humiliation he suffers at Robin's hands just intensifies it.
With the kind of escape that this film offered, it's little wonder one might find one's self sorry that the film was over. Everything about this movie was designed (and rather effectively) to take the mind off of the cares of everyday life. It was so well designed to this task that it serves to provide that level of escape to this day. At the time the movie was released, the Great Depression was just approaching its end and life was not easy. I can only imagine that the escape this film provided was welcomed and enjoyed.
I've been watching this film since I was a child. I've lost count of how many times I've seen it. And I can say with the greatest certainty, that, every single time I watched it, when it ended, I was sorry it was over.